May 03, 2009
There is no such thing as a Japanese aircraft carrier...
Nothing to see here move along.
But it's not a carrier. Can't be, the Japanese constitution forbids the JMSDF from having carriers.
Don't know what you're talking about!
Posted by: Wonderduck at Sun May 3 23:17:48 2009 (/nYBT)
Posted by: Andy Janes at Mon May 4 05:16:28 2009 (4DhfH)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Mon May 4 13:03:24 2009 (/ppBw)
Posted by: Bill at Mon May 4 13:59:59 2009 (mUl8k)
What if... RUSSIANS BUILD A BRIDGE?
Because the Russians have never heard of landing craft? Or airborne troops?
Posted by: Wonderduck at Mon May 4 21:24:09 2009 (Cq4Jw)
Personally, I wonder if the flag on the fantail of the not-a-carrier is going to cause just as much of a stir as the not-a-carrier itself. A couple of retired army types were saying that a few years back a picture was circulating of a JSDF tank unit on exercise where one of the crew in the lead tank is clearly waving the old Imperial battle flag, and that the photo had proven a major PR problem for the JSDF by pissing off the Chinese and Koreans.
Posted by: Civilis at Tue May 5 20:57:35 2009 (eAUSz)
Posted by: toadold at Sun May 10 23:41:41 2009 (rfjBl)
66 queries taking 0.1909 seconds, 282 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.