May 18, 2007
On Guns
Maxim Popenker, who runs an excellent military firearms reference site, has just added a page on civilian firearms.
His first choices are interesting to say the least.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05c28/05c28e9a4f70e5ddbf526e763e7f6a30babc567f" alt=""
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Maxim Popenker, who runs an excellent military firearms reference site, has just added a page on civilian firearms.
His first choices are interesting to say the least.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05c28/05c28e9a4f70e5ddbf526e763e7f6a30babc567f" alt=""
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at
10:46 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Seems like a fairly natural selection, largely driven by the U.S. market. Kel-Tec is not big in export market, but SU-16 is great, if the user understands the weapon. Basically, don't unfold the handguard ever (it moves your point of aim/hit). The finish on SU-16 is very rough. For example, the trigger guard often has injection molding gourd. However, the action is made well and fit well. It's kind of like StG.43 on 1944 manufacture :-) I keep thinking about getting one, especially since I saw the CA model.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Sat May 19 14:20:57 2007 (GMPOs)
2
I've heard good things about theKel Tec weapons aside from rough finish. I wasn't suggesting that the guns he chose were lacking merit, just that they were interesting and not as commonly covered as some, which is a feature, not a bug.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faa3e/faa3eb012cdb407c7a745aecbdfa7f62c66e822d" alt=""
Posted by: Ken Talton at Sat May 19 20:43:51 2007 (pz4J1)
29kb generated in CPU 0.0115, elapsed 0.081 seconds.
69 queries taking 0.0728 seconds, 367 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
69 queries taking 0.0728 seconds, 367 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.