May 10, 2013

Ahem.

Just because something was published in 1957 does not actually make it "work-safe".

The word(s) work-safe means something.

I'm pretty sure that it's definition does NOT encompass burlesque .gifs in the old movie .gif thread.

The amazing thing was that this did not appear to just be a troll. This actually started a "conversation" where the poster seemed to think that "If it's from 1957 it CAN'T be pr0n"...."DUDE, it's Black and White!".

Ahem...

Posted by: The Brickmuppet at 04:49 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Apparently he hasn't ever heard of Bettie Page.

Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Fri May 10 22:41:14 2013 (+rSRq)

2 That came up as an example of how '50s pr0n wasn't actually pr0n. Of course burlesque isn't pr0n...but neither is it work safe.

Loneliness and internet "culture" can combine to completely detach one from propriety. We all must be on guard against this dynamic.

I find from time to time that I am not immune to this.

Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Sat May 11 12:23:30 2013 (F7DdT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
28kb generated in CPU 0.023, elapsed 0.3666 seconds.
69 queries taking 0.355 seconds, 357 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.