Note: Not a real Economist cover. Was pilfered from 4-Chan Apologies for the profanity....but damn.
There may be a thin silver lining to the downgrade, in that interest rates may go up substantially. This is terrible news for the economy of course but it will help those who are on fixed incomes with savings.
Not only can’t the Super Committee fail, it’ll be under enormous public
pressure to reach a grand bargain. That’s the silver lining in this
cloud — they have to get serious now. They have no choice.
Pretty much all the other ramifications seem to...umm...suck.
It's Not Politics..It's History
That is my story and I am sticking to it.
...and even if it was politics I don't have to put it below the fold 'cause to be appalled by it (or to suffer from cognitive dissonance) you'd have to click on it.
In case you did click on it and got yourself all appalled and stuff, then as a palate cleanser here is a remarkably cute catgirl with some fish that was drawn by Toshihide Sano.
The Above link is his PixyV page. His official website was here but is either inactive or is blocking access from the US.
Stupidity ≠Malice
...but the results are hard to tell apart. The Anchoress has a post up regarding the current administration that some will find off-putting, but it's a good opportunity to touch on something I've wanted to...
..What?
Oh right. It's politics...so it goes below the fold...
1
I did read one account about how "pulsing" the river flow tended to produce a scrubbing effect that helps keep the river bed from silting up - so it's entirely possible that this is being done, not purely for environmental purposes, but also to help keep the river navigable. Believable and a whole lot more palatable. Any idea whether it's correct?
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at Mon Jun 27 20:42:59 2011 (pWQz4)
2
I can find no reference to any rationale for the pulse aside from
helping sturgeon (not an ignoble goal of course).
see here: http://www.connectmidmissouri.com/news/story.aspx?id=598394
This seems to fit with the American Thinker story. They had canceled the
pulse because of the rising water but had already filled the reservoirs
in anticipation of the pulse leaving nowhere for the water to go.
A little incompetence and very bad luck.
The navigability rationale you mentioned would seem to make sense,
that's how they
used to clean out city
drainage systems. However, I'm not sure rivers respond the same.
I couldn't find any reference to the pulse meing mentioned in
association with navigation issues other than this
from 2009
OMAHA
– A small pulse of water will be put into
the Missouri River beginning Mar. 21 to benefit the endangered pallid
sturgeon, the Army Corps of Engineers announced today. The pulse
complies with the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
2003 Amended Biological Opinion. Previous pulses were conducted in May
2006 and March 2008.
The pulse will coincide with the annual increase in releases from
Gavins
Point Dam, near Yankton, S.D., to provide flows for commercial
navigation and other downstream uses from Sioux City, Iowa, to the
Mississippi River. This will be the seventh consecutive year only
minimum navigation flows will be supported because of drought impacts on
upstream reservoirs.
The pulse seems to be purely a happy sturgeon thing, but in the quoted
case coincided with raising the water level for navigation.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wed Jun 29 00:13:42 2011 (EJaOX)
3
There is, of course, the view that stupidity is the natural defense of our leaders for their actions, protecting them from eyes that might seek the hidden motivations for the works of their hands. In other words, are they just stupid, or are they just pretending to be?
Afterall, at least in foreign policy:
"Generally, US foreign policy is remarkably consistent and cohesive, a deadly success, given the interests it represents. Those who see it as repeatedly befuddled are themselves revealing their own befuddlement.
Sometimes the policymakers themselves seize upon incompetence as a cover. -- Social Historian and author Michael Parenti
Posted by: Steven P. Cornett at Sun Jul 3 23:36:36 2011 (b5lVB)
One theory is that this was a false-flag operation to create evidence that would support gun control.
It has long been a leftist talking point that "most of the guns being used in Mexico are coming from the US", which was being used to argue that gun sales should be severely curtailed and subject to all kinds of limits. Problem with it was that it wasn't true.
So the theory goes that they decided to make it true.
If so, they were blitheringly stupid, but at least it makes some sense. I don't know if it's the case, however.
2
Yeah, I've heard that too. I've tended to dismiss it as too conspiratorial....and yet....
The scary thing is that that is the only thing that makes this horrific fiasco make any sort of sense....Of course this 'Reichstag fire' theory is actually scarier than if it was just incompetence.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Sat Jun 18 22:42:44 2011 (EJaOX)
OH
There wasn't a rapture today....it was that other 'r' word. RUBICON
President Obama has decided that neither the war powers act nor the constitution apply to the adventurewar kinetic military action in Libya.
Note that in 2003, despite the fact that we had been technically at war with them since '91 and Iraq was giving bonuses to the families of suicide bombers who killed our allies the Israelis, Bush went before congress and got an Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq. Despite this there are those who say that this was insufficient and that 'ChimpyMcBushitler' went to war illegally. I'm sure that those who consider the Iraq war illegal will be absolutely beside themselves over this.
1
"I'm sure that those who consider the Iraq war illegal will be absolutely beside themselves over this. Any minute now...Yessirree..."
Actually, The Usual Suspects (Michael Moore and Cindy Sheenan, for example) are upset about this. The thing is, The Usual Suspects aren't getting any screen time now, because the "fair and unbiased" mainstream media doesn't want to make their BFF the Obama administration look bad. It seems the Useful Idiots have outlived their usefulness...
Posted by: Peter the Not-so-Great at Sat May 21 17:37:08 2011 (wL7w9)
2
With a few hours remaining before time ran out, Obama did finally ask Congress for an AUMF.
3
What I'm reading is that he sent an 11th hour notification, but that the
notification was of his belief that the War Powers Act does not apply.
From the linked article:
In an effort to satisfy those arguing he needs to seek congressional
authorization to continue US military activity in accordance with the
War Powers Resolution, President Obama wrote a letter to congressional
leaders this afternoon suggesting that the role is now so "limited†he
does not need to seek congressional approval.
Emphasis mine.
If there has been a AUMF request I've rolled a critical failure on my Bing-fu. (Not an impossibility by any means)
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Sun May 22 01:39:40 2011 (EJaOX)
Althouse Notes the Other Trump
Now, those of us on the right have been pointing out that the little fascist is start-raving-cuckoo-for-cocca-puffs for years now and been ignored.
In Which I Pariah-fy Myself
I have long had a great deal of respect for Allan West, ( R, FL-22).
Below is video of him giving a superb speech at the close of CEPAC 2011. The speech itself is quite good, but that is not why I'm commenting on it. It is after all being widely shown throughout the rightosphere.
I'm commenting because this clip, which I got via Cdr. Salamander, has footage I had previously missed...Footage that bothers me.
West's speech begins about 8 and a half minutes in, but it is what happens prior that I find disturbing. Specifically, West is introduced by a military service member in uniform who proceeds to make a very short but quite partisan statement at a completely partisan function...I remind you that he is in uniform.
I like West a lot, but this is a no-no.
A big no-no.
It is not acceptable for the military to get involved in politics in any way. That is how republics die. I would expect West, who is a history buff ought to know that. He is certainly aware of Department of Defense Directive 1344.10 (and for the USCG, the Hatch Act).
It is inevitable that when one party is the one that spat on our military and still treats them with barely disguised contempt, that many in the military lean the other way...when out of uniform and off duty. It is not in any way acceptable for them to be expressing that as military members in uniform.
As I mentioned during the McChrystal fiasco, we have many republics to the south of us in this hemisphere.Most had the military get involved in politics in some way.That did not turn out well.
This is disturbing. But not as disturbing as the fact that I've not heard ANYONE comment on this, which bothers me rather more than the indiscretion itself.
UPDATE: Over at Cdr Salamander's, people are commenting on this impropriety. I note that they all seem to be current or former military.
UPDATE 2:The video has been removed by the user. A slightly shorter version with the 8 minute introduction removed can be seen here. It contains the bit relevant to my concern as well as the otherwise excellent speech. The full C-SPAN vid with intro is available on C-Span for now here
A Simple Bit of Math
I don't post as much uninformed blather on policy ideas as I used to because: 1: There are others who do it better. 2: The topic depresses me because there are few options open to us and all are varying levels of grim. 3: There are those few people who can make informed posts on policy.
Jack made a good point last week over at USNIBlog,
Something’s
gotta give. In 2009, the U.S. spent $187 billion (more than China’s
defense budget) paying off interest on government debt.
He goes on. It's short. Read the whole thing.
In the late 19th
early 20th century when other developing countries were going deep into
debt for short term gain, Japan had a pretty simple defense strategy.
"Rich nation=strong army"
This was the slogan of all mainstream political parties there for something like 40 years. Men of great substance and ability like Eiichi Shibusawa were encouraged to be entrepreneurs and helped to bring Japan into the modern era.
Around the turn of the century Argentina developed a rather different policy... which I'll paraphrase with all due malice as "hope and change".
Argentina had many advantages over Japan, being an established
republic that was on a par with the USA and only a little behind Europe
technologically.
Argentina has never recovered.
Japan became a world power and was quite successful until they went off their trolley in the '30s.
I see many parallels between then and now.
I do not like them.
The options we have now, as I said earlier, are quite limited. They will grow more limited as time passes. We MAY have until 2013-14 to regain steering, and turn the ship of state away from the iceberg we are approaching. We are so close and our inertia is so great that we will suffer damage regardless, but as time passes our ability to meaningfully change course, even if we regain full helm control is steadily reduced, until oblivion is inevitable no mater what, so time is of the essence.
Of course, right now we don't have the bridge and have control of only one engine room....so the only thing we can realistically do in the next two years is reduce our speed.
1
To be fair, Japan was also undergoing an industrial revolution, which produces a high growth rate as labor is shifted from subsistence farming to industrial goods.
At the end of the day, we've got one big advantage - most of the alternative powers have the same problems we've got, except worse. If the wave breaks, it's going to hammer most of them under before it gets to us. (Not that everything will then be hunky-dory here, but you know what they say about outrunning the tiger.)
And in a worst-case scenario, it's not as if the US doesn't have, well... an incomparable military, thousands of nukes, and absolutely unquestioned mastery of the seas. If the world order breaks down to the point where it becomes "grab what you can get" time, we're in a good position for grabbing and getting. (For that matter, we could stave off the decline for a long, long time just by receiving subsidies from other countries who don't want to see an over-gunned US backed into a corner. You could even argue that this is already happening - you didn't think that China was investing in US government bonds because they liked the returns, did you?)
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at Tue Jan 18 19:01:13 2011 (pWQz4)
2
Yes. Japan benefited from the impressive growth curve that came from industrialization. However, they recognized that growing their economy was a sine qua non of having a strong military.
Other developing countries did not and became colonies. Yes we have an impressive military but that will pass very quickly if we are bankrupt.
I don't think we'll get overrun, we still have nukes, but that is a worrisome thing to have as ones plan B, rather than plan Z sublevel 5 last resort.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Sun Jan 30 06:02:39 2011 (EJaOX)
Now the reason I bother to link to this when its been on the high traffic blogs already is that it brought to mind this piece from theBlogprof....which contains, amongst much text, video of Ted Rall on MSNBC urging his people to arm themselves for class struggle and making the usual paranoid rants and idiotic associations involving the Tea Party...you know, those scary people who pick up trash, rather than trash the town.
Then there was the snowplow-gate and then this warning that I found going through my tabs before closing down tonight, it warns about the likelihood of European style municipal worker strikes.
If city workers did undermine the snow-clearing effort to
protest budget cuts, they may have contributed to the death of a
baby girl in Brooklyn, who waited with her 22-year-old mother
nine hours for emergency crews to fight their way through the
snow-covered streets. A Queens woman watched her elderly mother
die as she waited three hours for an ambulance to arrive.
Americans better get used to this treatment.
The emphasis is mine. The picture's from 4-chan.
And then this final tidbit. Francis Fox Piven, (Yes THAT Piven) calling for American leftist to please kill people and break things like their European counterparts.
How Civilizations Fall
Via Scott Lowther comes a speech given in Australia by Niall Ferguson on the collapse of Empires.
Really informative and not a little scary.
The speech is here and it actually begins at the 9 minute mark, and the facts and figures start around minute 23. It's about an hour and fifteen minutes long but well worth it.
"Tell me Director, what is your reply to the Teddy Bear's accusation that you are a tool of Goldman Sachs."
Posted by: toadold at Tue Nov 16 15:14:42 2010 (cPdX6)
2
Definitely viral; last night my 2nd grade daughter asked to see "the video with the dogs talking about the Goldman Sachs." I'd love to see her make a report to the class on this... minus the scatological references, of course.
Posted by: Tiberius at Wed Nov 17 17:07:45 2010 (PWSkp)
It isn't looking good for the Senate, but as I type this Republicans are looking at 60 or so pickups in the house.
UPDATE:Nikki Haley looks to have pulled it off, as have Tim Scott and Allen West. Damn wacist wipubwicanz... Senate is now un-winable, but the house looks to be a bigger win than anticipated.
Defrost the pudding.
UPDATE: Good speech by Boehner. It is late I have 2 hours to sleep. Good night.
UPDATE NEXT DAY: Woah... I hadn't seen the last bit of Boehners speech. It's still a very good, non-triumphal victory speech...just...damn.
De-Registered?
When I got off work today, I went straight to my new polling location in Churchland. When I had changed my address and drivers license at the DMV, I was sure to change my voter registration info.
Alas I am not in the system.
I've voted in every election except a few uncontested midterm elections since 1988.
The poll watchers actually asked if I had changed my registration status at the DMV as this has been an issue today in this precinct.
Well, after some searching I was informed that I might still be on the rolls at my old polling place in Newport News, on the other side of the tunnel traffic I had just slogged through... The polling place that is actually walking distance from work.
Before I left I got specific instructions on where and how to register at the registrars office.... ...which is pretty self explanatory but so was the DMV. The pollwatchers were professional and helpful and, again mentioned that this had been an issue this morning. In fact two other people had the same issue before I left.
I'm discouraged, so I should jut blow the whole thing off, I mean it's not like one vote is going to matter....'sides this thing is in the bag...
NOT!
That's how 'they' GET YOU!
Besides, too many people have died to give us this right.
Too many still endure real peril to exercise this right ...
...for a grown American man to be defeated by traffic and a 40 minute drive.
However, as I've already missed my Tuesday class because of this fiasco and have been up 31 hours, I am going to get a nap first.
More to follow.
UPDATE: Well, I voted, but not in the election for MY congresscritter, but in the election for the CC representing my old precinct. I noted that of the 17 other people in this second polling place, 3 were off to the side with similar issues to myself, all involving DMV registration.
Although I was on the rolls in Newport News, my ID (with my current address) did raise some eyebrows and got me sidelined for a bit with paperwork and questions. This is not a bad thing of course. The pollworkers in Newport News like the ones in Portsmouth were patient and professional.
The pollworkers said it had been really busy for an off year election. The voter traffic seemed to be picking up quite a bit as I left, just over 30 minutes before the polls closed.
1
This is why I vote early, not on election day, not by absentee.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Tue Nov 2 16:12:28 2010 (9KseV)
2
I love the system here in Oregon. Everyone votes by mail. No exceptions.
When I lived in Los Angeles it was more 'interesting'. I lived for a while in a heavily democrat precinct, and the polling place was constantly in disarray with people not knowing if they were in the right place, not registered, etc. I occasionally got dirty looks along with my republican voter cards. Then I moved into a republican-leaning precinct, and it got even more interesting. The staffers were efficient, friendly, etc. But they were continually being short-changed by the county and state, and polling places would move around randomly between elections, you'd get mail clearly stating which polling place to go, and they wouldn't have you one the books and you'd have to drive around to two or three other polling places to find the place that had you.
Posted by: David at Tue Nov 2 18:44:20 2010 (rj+nH)
The staffers were efficient, friendly, etc. But they were continually
being short-changed by the county and state, and polling places would
move around randomly between elections, you'd get mail clearly stating
which polling place to go, and they wouldn't have you one the books and
you'd have to drive around to two or three other polling places to find
the place that had you.
Yeah, that was a problem here a few years ago, I had to go to 3 polling places to vote once.
This time it was the fact that he DMV had not passed on address changes. I should have gone to the registrar instead of the DMV, but I thought I could get everything regards the move done at once. I was fortunate I had moved less than an hour away from my old house.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Tue Nov 2 19:23:43 2010 (EJaOX)
Exams are Over
After a remarkably spread out 2 weeks of exams I did manage to get all "A"s and "B"s. Oddly, I got docked 4 points on one for giving too comprehensive an answer.
Tomorrow is the election. I think it is going to be more of a near run thing than is being hyped.
I have just gotten in and need to be to work in 4 hours...so I'm just gonna leave this here...
The Extent of Tolerance Amongst the "Tolerant"
All the intertubes, the airwaves and the cablewaves are abuzz with talk
about the firing of Juan Williams by NPR. I hadn't planned on commenting
on it as pretty much EVERYONE already has, and the notion that NPR is
hysterically PC is the definition of dog bites man.
If, by some chance, you are unaware of the Juan Williams story the Anchoress has it pretty much covered with a long post that includes about 60 hyperlinks and asks a question.
Schiller kind of makes me wonder if too many people
aren’t in powerful positions these days because of their skills in
lockstepping, rather than because of their smarts.
And I think the answer is yes, but more on that in a minute.
One reason this post is here is because of another very similar incident. Today, Elizabeth Moon,
was disinvited from a con in Wisconsin. As it happens, it was the same
con that was the subject of the post below...clicking on a related
hyperlink is how I found out about this.
Like Williams, Moon is a lefty, (in fact she's a full metal Bush hater and she has said some pretty vile things about righties) and like Williams years of doing a pretty good job (she's a superb author)
and having, I gather, a majority of her views in agreement with the
left brought no respite when she made a perfectly reasonable but
politically incorrect statement , in her case a long thoughtful blog post,
that violated todays unwritten blasphemy laws. That is both made
comments that did not sing the praises of Islam, absolve all
practitioners of said religion of all responsibility for any
unpleasantness and praise merciful Allah.
That is the unforgivable blasphemy.
Greg Gutfield sums this up very well here,
pointing out that such obsequious kow-towing to Islamic rabble rousers
not only encourages more of the same behavior but is tacitly
Islamaphobic in and of itself.
But it gets worse...because neither of these incidents is really about self censorship
out of fear, or respect. In fact, I think the defering to Islam
issue, while a real issue, is a smokescreen in both these cases.
Both the bureaucrats at NPR and the staff at WisCon are using the Islamaphobia canard (and in both these cases it is truly an idiotic canard) to mask the fact that they are working very hard to stifle all dissent against their worldview. In NPRs case they were by their own admission
upset that Williams appeared on FOX as a ( dissenting ) analyst. The
Islamic not phobia is just to cover their asses while they crack the
whip and enforce their world view. Williams wasn't even really fired for
having double plus ungood thoughts....he was fired for his
associations.
Moon got disinvited from the con because the main thrust of her post was
that people do not have unlimited entitlement. Even worse, she suggested
people have a responsibility to comport themselves well and behave as
good citizens. This flies in the face of the total entitlement worldview
that I've observed in the upper reaches of fandom over the years. I
have long observed that there are few people as tolerant as certain left
leaning fans...so long as one is in complete agreement with them.
On their own neither of these incidents will be in any way lasting.
Neither Williams nor Moon will suffer from this. Williams will likely go
full time at Fox. Judging by this comment thread
Moon will have a weekend free from shrill condescending lectures by
bitter, passive aggressive women whose con is an opportunity to lecture,
badger and exert control over others and who go all to pieces if
someone strays from leftist victim orthodoxy in the slightest. I hope
she enjoys the respite.
The reason these two incidents are worthy of comment is that political
correctness is becoming an increasingly accepted bludgeon and cover for
ideological purging and power plays. And it is working. It is working in
part because, as the Anchoress suggests an increasing number of people
are getting advanced in bureaucracies because of ideological purity
rather than actual performance. While they may not have the broadest
experience or the keenest mind these Parsons Wannabees can, in fact,
be quite dangerous to ones career.
"Parsons was Winston's fellow employee at the Ministry of Truth. He was
a fattish but active man of paralyzing stupidity, a mass of imbecile
enthusiasms—one of those completely unquestioning, devoted drudges on
whom, more even than on the thought police, the stability of the Party
depended."
1
If NPR pays his wages and he is hired to write for NPR and represent the viewpoint of NPR, what is wrong with NPR asking him to fulfill his contract?
I wonder how much tolerance Fox News would have for someone who came on air and had doubts about the US invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq while they were occurring?
The reality is that most American criticism of Islam and Muslims is based on ignorance and prejudice, amounting to bigotry. Too many Americans assume that by listening to what the Islamists say and claim about Islam and Muslims, all Muslims are the like that. Its like suggesting that by listening to the "Reverend" Fred Phelps people will know and understand what Christianity is all about. Its silly and its wrong. Just as Phelps is as representative of mainstream Christian thought and preaching, so are the Islamists of mainstream Muslim and Islamic thought and practice.
If this wanker Williams had taken his NPR hat off and made his comments as a private individual, you may have a point. He didn't though, did he? He made them as an NPR representative and so it isn't surprising they've put his head on the chopping block (metaphorically speaking). It isn't nice but it is how modern corporations and modern society work.
Posted by: Bearded Dragon at Mon Oct 25 04:43:38 2010 (dONAr)
2If NPR pays his wages and he is hired to write for NPR and represent the
viewpoint of NPR, what is wrong with NPR asking him to fulfill his
contract?
You mean the Taxpayer-funded radio network? The one that's supposed to represent (but never has) the people? The one that's firing someone for having an opinion?
You appear to believe that NPR is a normal radio station, privately owned... it's not.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Mon Oct 25 12:29:50 2010 (vW/MM)
3I wonder how much tolerance Fox News would have for someone who came on
air and had doubts about the US invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq while
they were occurring?
I'll point out, if the difference isn't obvious, that Fox News (as well as ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN) is a private entity, and therefore can do whatever they want (within reason) with their employees.
NPR is not.
Posted by: Wonderduck at Mon Oct 25 12:36:46 2010 (vW/MM)
If NPR pays his wages and he is hired to write for NPR and represent the
viewpoint of NPR, what is wrong with NPR asking him to fulfill his
contract?
Nothing, but there is no indication that he did not do so. If there was a contractual issue with him being on another network it would have come up before.
Williams said that he felt unease when on a plane with a Muslim loudly
proclaiming that he was Islamic first....and that we need to be
sure that these feelings don't cause us to discriminate against
Muslims.This is rather more nuanced than "How to speak teabag" or wishing that Jesse Helms's grandchildren would get AIDs, both of which were done with the full sanction of NPR. Now NPR can have an editorial opinion, and be as demonstrably biased as they indeed are (the first amendment rocks) but they really ought not to do it on the taxpayer dime. Indeed govt. financed partisan propaganda may well be illegal under 5 U.S.C. 3107.
I wonder how much tolerance Fox News would have for someone who came
on air and had doubts about the US invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq
while they were occurring?
Judge Andrew Napoliatano is and always has been loudly, vehemently and unashamedly opposed to both wars and has said so with zero equivocation every time it has come up. He has been with FOX since 1998 and is their senior legal analyst. He is so much of a pariah at FOX that he has been the main backup host for both O'Reily and Beck, is a frequent guest on all their shows and is now being so ruthlessly censored that he has been given his very own show on FBN.
(This is not to say that FOX is neutral, they wear their editorial direction on their sleeve, but they do tend to have guests and analysts from opposing viewpoints that are mainstream members in good standing of their respective movements.)
There is little more to say on this kerfuffle that hasn't been said elsewhere, as I said in the post it will have little long term effect on Williams or Moon, but the trend of intimidating those with opinions that are the least bit divergent from current leftist orthodoxy is a troubling one and given the leanings of a majority of the media and academia is more pervasive than many seem to suppose.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Mon Oct 25 20:21:55 2010 (EJaOX)
5
Why do you assume that Fox represents mainstream views and NPR does not?
It appears that you would prefer that NPR simply became another mouthpiece for your views. As I understand the function of a public broadcasting system is to be rather like that of the slave who used to stand behind the parading general during a Roman triumphal procession and whisper in "Respica te, hominem te memento".
By holding a mirror up to your society NPR make it remember its failings. You should be glad that your society has created such an institution and that NPR is not merely a mouthpiece for the government and its views.
Fox represents one viewpoint - the right wing viewpoint with its jingoistic, over the top yellow journalism.During the invasion of Iraq and long afterwards it was the government's mouthpiece.
Posted by: Bearded Dragon at Tue Oct 26 07:48:03 2010 (dONAr)
Why do you assume that Fox represents mainstream views and NPR does not?
Ratings, dear boy. Ratings.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Tue Oct 26 07:53:17 2010 (PiXy!)
7As I understand the function of a public broadcasting system is to be
rather like that of the slave who used to stand behind the parading
general during a Roman triumphal procession and whisper in "Respica te, hominem te memento".
Then I'm afraid you understand incorrectly, dear boy.
The original purposes of NPR, as ratified by the Board of Directors, are the following:
Provide an identifiable daily product which is consistent and reflects the highest standards of broadcast journalism.Provide extended coverage of public events, issues and ideas, and to acquire and produce special public affairs programs.Acquire and produce cultural programs which can be scheduled individually by stations.Provide access to the intellectual and cultural resources of cities,
universities and rural districts through a system of cooperative
program development with member public radio stations.Develop and distribute programs for specific groups (adult
education, instruction, modular units for local productions) which may
meet needs of individual regions or groups, but may not have general
national relevance.Establish liaison with foreign broadcasters for a program exchange service.Produce materials specifically intended to develop the art and technical potential of radio.Show me where political works are to enter into the matter, please?
Posted by: Wonderduck at Tue Oct 26 23:53:41 2010 (vW/MM)
8
As I understand the function of a public broadcasting system is to be rather like that of the slave who used to stand behind the parading general during a Roman triumphal procession and whisper in "Respica te, hominem te memento".Your understanding is faulty.
I observed NPR's actions during Gulf War I and its actions during the beginning of the Clinton administration. The "loyal opposition" effect disappeared immediately after his inauguration.
(I remember an interesting interview of a college professor who was shocked that his Marine Corps reservist son would actually have to go out and maybe kill someone. Odd branch of service to choose, in my opinion.)
Posted by: Mark A. Flacy at Mon Nov 1 16:15:00 2010 (Lbkvv)
9
The first paragraph of my previous post should have been quoted. The last sentence should have not been part of the quoted material.
(I keep finding the mee.nu commenting system an incomprehensible mixture of BBCode and HTML. If the commenting system doesn't understand blockquote tags, then it should not attempt to render them.)
Posted by: Mark A. Flacy at Mon Nov 1 16:27:55 2010 (Lbkvv)
Hobby Space News of the commercial space industry A Babe In The Universe Rather Eclectic Cosmology Encyclopedia Astronautica Superb spacecraft resource The Unwanted Blog Scott Lowther blogs about forgotten aerospace projects and sells amazingly informative articles on the same. Also, there are cats. Transterrestrial Musings Commentary on Infinity...and beyond! Colony WorldsSpace colonization news! The Alternate Energy Blog It's a blog about alternate energy (DUH!) Next Big Future Brian Wang: Tracking our progress to the FUTURE. Nuclear Green Charles Barton, who seems to be either a cool curmudgeon, or a rational hippy, talks about energy policy and the terrible environmental consequences of not going nuclear Energy From Thorium Focuses on the merits of thorium cycle nuclear reactors WizBang Current events commentary...with a wiz and a bang The Gates of Vienna Tenaciously studying a very old war The Anchoress insightful blogging, presumably from the catacombs Murdoc Online"Howling Mad Murdoc" has a millblog...golly! EaglespeakMaritime security matters Commander Salamander Fullbore blackshoe blogging! Belmont Club Richard Fernandez blogs on current events BaldilocksUnderstated and interesting blog on current events The Dissident Frogman French bi-lingual current events blog The "Moderate" VoiceI don't think that word means what they think it does....but this lefty blog is a worthy read nonetheless. Meryl Yourish News, Jews and Meryls' Views Classical Values Eric Scheie blogs about the culture war and its incompatibility with our republic. Jerry Pournell: Chaos ManorOne of Science fictions greats blogs on futurism, current events, technology and wisdom A Distant Soil The website of Colleen Dorans' superb fantasy comic, includes a blog focused on the comic industry, creator issues and human rights. John C. Wright The Sci-Fi/ Fantasy writer muses on a wide range of topics. Now Read This! The founder of the UK Comics Creators Guild blogs on comics past and present. The Rambling Rebuilder Charity, relief work, roleplaying games Rats NestThe Art and rantings of Vince Riley Gorilla Daze Allan Harvey, UK based cartoonist and comics historian has a comicophillic blog! Pulpjunkie Tim Driscoll reviews old movies, silents and talkies, classics and clunkers. Suburban Banshee Just like a suburban Leprechaun....but taller, more dangerous and a certified genius. Satharn's Musings Through TimeThe Crazy Catlady of The Barony of Tir Ysgithr アニ・ノート(Ani-Nouto) Thoughtful, curmudgeonly, otakuism that pulls no punches and suffers no fools. Chizumatic Stephen Den Beste analyzes anime...with a microscope, a slide rule and a tricorder. Wonderduck Anime, Formula One Racing, Sad Girls in Snow...Duck Triumphalism Beta Waffle What will likely be the most thoroughly tested waffle evah! Zoopraxiscope Too In this thrilling sequel to Zoopraxiscope, Don, Middle American Man of Mystery, keeps tabs on anime, orchids, and absurdities. Mahou Meido MeganekkoUbu blogs on Anime, computer games and other non-vital interests Twentysided More geekery than you can shake a stick at Shoplifting in the Marketplace of Ideas Sounds like Plaigarism...but isn't Ambient IronyAll Meenuvians Praise the lathe of the maker! Hail Pixy!!