September 14, 2011
Golly.....
Back in 2009 the White House set up flag@whitehouse.gov for loyal
citizens to report opinions they thought were "fishy". That effort was
aimed at the healthcare debate and inspired this addition to our
otherwise apolitical rotating banners.
Now they're at it again with ATTACK WATCH, which asks loyal citizens to report any criticism of the POTUS along with (if possible) pictures of the seditious fiends. The menu for attacks includes : TV Interview, public statements, E-mail, Radio/TV Ads, Video Ads, Websites/Blogs and Robocalls. Victor Hanson has thoughts here. Professor Jacobson has tweets of teh day, and there's a WaPo article on this here, which keeps to the spirit of things by adding just a touch of the old memory hole.
Now, in fairness, this is not nearly as offensive as that previous Stassiism, given that AW is not being run from a .gov site. While this is damning with faint praise, the site is ONE way for them to get a grasp of various current concerns which the administrations cocoon of provincialism and tone deafness has heretofore done a good job of shielding them from. This is not to say that it is a GOOD way for them to get that info. Why...one might even go so far as to call it un-good....but that might be considered "fishy".
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Now they're at it again with ATTACK WATCH, which asks loyal citizens to report any criticism of the POTUS along with (if possible) pictures of the seditious fiends. The menu for attacks includes : TV Interview, public statements, E-mail, Radio/TV Ads, Video Ads, Websites/Blogs and Robocalls. Victor Hanson has thoughts here. Professor Jacobson has tweets of teh day, and there's a WaPo article on this here, which keeps to the spirit of things by adding just a touch of the old memory hole.
Now, in fairness, this is not nearly as offensive as that previous Stassiism, given that AW is not being run from a .gov site. While this is damning with faint praise, the site is ONE way for them to get a grasp of various current concerns which the administrations cocoon of provincialism and tone deafness has heretofore done a good job of shielding them from. This is not to say that it is a GOOD way for them to get that info. Why...one might even go so far as to call it un-good....but that might be considered "fishy".
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at
06:41 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 219 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Seems like we'd all be doing a public service to report all the cases where Democratic supporters come out in favor of violence against Republicans, wouldn't we?
Like Hoffa?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at Wed Sep 14 18:46:11 2011 (+rSRq)
26kb generated in CPU 0.0126, elapsed 0.0786 seconds.
69 queries taking 0.0703 seconds, 285 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
69 queries taking 0.0703 seconds, 285 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
