Currently, the probe is surveying the possible landing sites in preparation for releasing the lander.
Unlike previous probes this one is intended to extensively study exactly what forms the ice is in so we may find out if there really are formations as unexpectedly spectacular as the glaciers on Mercury.
Looking for Hohmann Transfer Tables
Some months ago, when I was otherwise obligated, I blundered into an online Hohmann orbit / travel time calculator for launch windows between all planets out to Jupiter (plus Ceres) out to IIRC 2050.
I can't find it now and suspect it may only be available from academic institutions, but I was wondering if anyone has a link to something similar.
1
There are static delta V tables here:
http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/appmissiontable.php
And I believe Winchell links to a calculator in the resources section as well.
Posted by: Directrix Gazer at Tue Aug 27 06:54:12 2019 (54G/I)
Here's Something Neat That You Don't see Everyday
Here we have a false color image of...something.
Guess what the 'greenish-yellow' stuff is.
Is it :
A: Impact related lava flows in Lunar Craters?
B: Sand dunes in windswept craters on Mars?
C: Stromatolite colonies in brine pools in Australia?
Posted by: Mauser at Tue Jul 23 21:48:27 2019 (Ix1l6)
3
??? I thought Mercury wasn't tide-locked? How does this work? Is it constantly evaporating from the sun-facing side and condensing on the night side? According to the internet (grain-o-salt) mercury rotates 3 times for every two orbits about the sun.
Posted by: MadRocketSci at Tue Jul 23 21:56:42 2019 (K+Kza)
4
It was a minor plot point in some sci-fi game in my childhood that Mercurian miners would have to keep their equipment roving across the surface to avoid the sunrise.
Posted by: MadRocketSci at Tue Jul 23 21:58:04 2019 (K+Kza)
5
I guess the deep crater explanation is plausible if they're all above 90 deg latitude.
Posted by: MadRocketSci at Tue Jul 23 22:20:47 2019 (K+Kza)
6
Yeah, Mercury is in a 3:2 resonance, not tide-locked. So these are all at the north pole, where the crater walls are high enough to shield the ice from the Sun.
7
Mercury is surprisingly hard to get to and I don't think anyone has yet landed a probe there. Quite apart from being close to the sun where it's hot, it's got a high speed orbit and no gravity to speak of to assist in a capture, and then once you do establish an orbit, the surface rotation is fast enough to become a serious consideration when you try and figure out a landing. Messenger did something like 9 gravity assists and took several years to get to Mercury.
Posted by: David at Wed Jul 24 01:20:14 2019 (7VRIY)
Indeed. However, once one is there it is easier to get back from than one would assume of something so far down the sun's gravity well. You see, its orbit is so fast that it acts like an additional rocket stage, so theoretically, mass drivers on Mercury could sent a constant stream of metals earthward without too much cost or difficulty once sufficient infrastructure had been built up.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Wed Jul 24 06:14:30 2019 (YUAc9)
Here is an excellent study of the interior of the Stanford Torus space habitat by Rick Guidice.
It's particularly notable as one of the few renditions to get the scale of the actual final design right.
The Stanford Torus was the final in a series of designs intended as minimum sized test beds for a self sustaining space habitat. The Stanford Torus's habitation tube was "only" 430 feet wide. That's still almost half again wider than a football field is long, and it would have been 3 and a half miles (5.6K) long, which is pretty impressive.
Since That Last Post Was Depressing (UPDATED)
Here's something to give existential threat assessors hives, and the rest of us hope.
It's Ryan Weed, the CEO of Positron Dynamics who claims to have solved antimatter's production and containment issues. He's getting around the storage problem by the elegant method of avoiding it totally. They're generating positrons on the spot (using Krypton79 decaying to Kr78 ) and firing them into deuterium to catalyze fusion. The neutrons from the reaction transmutes the Kr78 back to Kr79 and the associated 'splody travels out the tailpipe and goes "woosh". Research is looking promising, but there are already some interesting spinoffs, which include a nuclear battery with a yield of as much as 100 watts a kilogram.
UPDATE:
Here's an animation of how their system is supposed to work.
1
Gah, I read the YouTube comments. All doubters. One might have even had a valid criticism.
Posted by: Mauser at Sun Mar 10 20:21:00 2019 (Ix1l6)
2
I'm deeply suspicious of any group promoting a breakthrough technology whose website is that slick.
Posted by: Directrix Gazer at Sun Mar 10 21:30:53 2019 (vckNJ)
3
The company has been around since 2012. I understand they got shut down a few years ago when the local government discovered they were working with antimatter. It took a while to get their tests back on track but those tests were apparently promising since NASA just gave them a grant. They have mentioned that they want to get a cubesat to test one of their engines before the decade is out.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Mon Mar 11 08:41:20 2019 (xOgT9)
Meanwhile, In the Kuiper Belt
N.A.S.A.s New Horizons probe has just had its best pictures of "
_2014_MU69">Ultima Thule" processed. Now we've sent one of The Brickmuppet's Crack Team of Science Babes to bring us the latest on this Kuiper belt object. However, given what we've seen so far it's fairly clear that it is just a bog standard comet and pretty much uninteresting in any way.
"That last sentence is about as wrong as is grammatically possible."
Oh.
Well, it appears that Ultima Thule still had some surprises, one of which was only revealed when the spacecraft flew past it.
You see, according to the mission webpage, this is believed to be the best picture that New Horizons took of Ultima Thule...
There's a lot of oddness, including the fact that it appears to be a conjoined comet. Then New Horizons flew by the object aaand....
Why that should be is unclear to say the least, but it is interesting that one of the explanations for the weirdness of the recently departed Omuamua is that it was flat enough to be affected by solar pressure. Perhaps something causes objects on edge of interstellar space to flatten.
In any event, it's NEAT!
And, rarely does science give us such a straightforward and unambiguous lesson in the importance of perspective.
The News is All About Hamburgers and Overpriced Razors So Here's Some Space Stuff
One of The Brickmuppet's Crack Team of Science Babes brings us the latest developments the search for extraterrestrial intelligence...
"My new favorite word is Technosignature."
The short video is a good quick overview of SETI issues. However, Mr. Cain also links to the referenced NASA report as well as the recent SETI conference minutes, which can provide hours of amusement.
In other SPACE news, while we wait for high resolution pictures from Ultima Thule NASA is providing some visual perspective on the matter.
1
A long time ago I was running Seti@Home as a screen saver. (I tried the newer one a year or so ago and nearly fried my computer!). When I read the description of what they were looking for, the frequencies they were checking didn't really make sense. They weren't searching for emissions in the band where there was the least interstellar noise, but around some natural frequency of some element (I forget which). It might have made some kind of symbolic mathematical sense, but there was no practical reason why aliens would USE that particular frequency band.
"Why of course anyone trying to communicate between the stars would use a harmonic of the Hydrogen resonance!"
"Really, I'd try the frequency most likely to get through."
*Gets pitched out the window.*
Posted by: Mauser at Wed Jan 16 00:42:01 2019 (Ix1l6)
2
Mauser, they look in the so-called hydrogen window because the other frequencies get absorbed by the interstellar medium (which is mostly diffuse hydrogen). If anyone were broadcasting on other frequencies, we wouldn't be able to detect it from a significant distance, in interstellar terms.
There's a degree of looking under the street lamp for your keys issue with that, of course, but we don't have much choice in the matter.
Posted by: Directrix Gazer at Wed Jan 16 15:21:11 2019 (QpQY7)
New Horizons VS. Ultima Thule
Well, tonight (tomorrow actually) after the fireworks and the dropping of the ball, you should stick around because there will be an encore celebration around 12:15AM, when Clyde Tombaugh's atomic powered urn, better known as NASA's New Horizons probe, which not so long ago gave us spectacular views of Pluto is going to pass by(486958) 2014 MU69, a small but very strange transNeptunian object that has been given the unofficial temporary name Ultima Thule for marketing purposes.
Note though, that possible explanations include that the object is actually surrounded by a cloud of debris, in which case there's a decent chance that New Horizons will come to an end in a collision.
Because it is SO far away, the radio signals will take over 9 hours to get to NASA! Coverage of that is set to start around 09:45 Eastern Time(U.S.). There is a press conference scheduled for 11:30 Eastern to discuss the pictures, or what can be gleaned from the probes loss. There will be a lot of discussion of this online tonight and tomorrow morning with Launchpad Astronomy already 4 hours into their 24 hr livestream.
So tonight, after the celebrations, sit back, watch the coverage and throw back an egg nog for Clyde Tombaugh, the little probe that carries his remains, and the implacable spirit of mankind.
Thoughts on Proxima B
Shortly after the discovery that Proxima Centauri, the closest star to our sun has a planet in the habitable zone, NASA pointed out that Proxima is known to be a flare star and the planet is so close that it would probably be grilled, baked and flash fried.
Now, two years later, they've finished a study adding potential variables to see if anything could mitigate the effects of the flaring, and surprisingly, there some scenarios which allow for a habitable planet and a few with a sort of Earthlike biosphere. These are HIGHLY speculative numbers as we know almost nothing about the planet except its orbit and mass. They are interesting nonetheless...
The odds are still on it being a burned out cinder, but even for this planet, that is not a given.
Note that the second closest planet to our solar system, (Ross128b) is a better candidate, not only because it doesn't face the flare issue, but is even closer in mass and temperature to Earth. With such variables as discussed in the Proxima-B video, its odds might be better still.
A few weeks ago we noted that Bloomberg had broken a HUGE news story that involved China inserting small chips onto mother boards that were intended to allow back door access to ALL THE HARDWARE.
A week or so later we noted that sourcing was rather....thin, and that no rice grain sized chips had been produced.
Now it appears that Apple (who has vociferously denied it all along) is demanding a retraction and apology from Bloomberg.
As Pixy noted in the comments to our first post on the matter, one of the reporters involved has a rather chequered history with computer spying stories.
That TECHDIRT story goes on to suggest that Bloomberg has whittled away their credibility on this and "set fire to the scraps".
For example people quoted in the original story are strongly contradicting it.
All of Bloomberg's sources on this are and remain anonymous. So as of now, the story seems to be a dumpster fire, that still hasn't produced any spy chips or any evidence whatsoever.
None of this is to suggest that its a good idea to be subcontracting our most vital components to overseas slaves whose masters hate our guts, or that this isn't an obvious and even likely threat. However, IF this story is in fact bunk, (as now seems likely) the "Cry Wolf Effect" will make it harder to prepare for such matters. Furthermore if this is bunk then those of us who reported it credulously will find it harder to be believed when it does come to pass.
1
I think every security researcher simultaneously agrees that (a) this could happen, (b) it's a huge problem, and (c) not one word of the Bloomberg story is actually true.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at Sun Oct 21 23:19:15 2018 (PiXy!)
Project H.A.V.O.C.
While the acronym does accurately convey the idea, the High Altitude Venus Operational Concept acronym might need some tweaking for PR reasons.
So far so good, except that as we all know, Venus's surface temperature is that of molten lead, its pressure is higher than in the Marianas Trench and after CO2 and Nitrogen, the most common atmospheric gas is sulfuric acid. Also it's gravity is about the same as Earth and so would require a full sized ( Titan or bigger) acid proof rocket to get the crew back into orbit in the unlikely event they weren't baked, dissolved, and crushed.
This is why Venus has not been on N.A.S.A.'s shortlist for places to visit.
Fortunately there is an amazingly cutting edge technology that allows a manned survey of Venus.
The Blimp!
The High Altitude Venus Operational Concept takes advantage of the fact that temperatures 34 miles above the surface are around 80 degrees and the pressure is that of Boulder Colorado. However because the CO2 atmosphere is much denser than nitrogen, earth air is a lifting gas at that altitude.
"Dirigibles in space!"
So the idea is to inflate the "landing" party's ship on the way down and have it double as a 423 foot long airship, (Actually a manned, dirigible, rockoon) and then fly around the planet for a few weeks or months doing more detailed surveys than can be done from orbit and tele-operating probes on the surface. This also allows for detailed chemical analysis of the atmosphere, using sensors lowered on tethers into the dense lower atmosphere, much like a oceanographer uses Nansen bottles to sample the deep.
After completing the mission, the Blimp will launch a rocket from high altitude (Like a Pegasus) and transport the crew into space, where they'll rendezvous with their mother ship and return to Earth.
Assuming an acid proof blimp, Venus is actually much safer than Mars for the astronauts. The gravity is about the same as Earth, the thick atmosphere plus the planet's weak magnetic field would protect the crew from cosmic rays even better than earth does. Venus is much easier to get to and launch windows open much more often than they do for Mars. Two precursor missions, one manned but confined to orbit and one using a 1 quarter scale drone dirigible to test acid proofing and demonstrate that the inflation/deployment system works would precede the crewed Venus blimp sortie..
This is a very good idea for an icebreaker mission. It's more advanced than the moon or asteroid missions currently in the pipeline but still far quicker, easier (and probably safer) than the upcoming mission to Mars. Such a mission would be far shorter in duration than a Mars landing and would be a nice stepping stone on the way to those missions as well as expeditions to the asteroids Mercury, Ceres and Callisto. Flags and footprints albeit without flags or dirty feet (but with a blimp!).
So, today we've discussed rockets, space travel, a manned mission to the planet Venus and an airship, nay, a rockoon even! The only thing that would make this cooler is a swordfight.
Or floating cities...
The fact that air is a lifting gas means that large, long term settlements are theoretically possible, with all the advantages regarding radiation and gravity listed above. Even the sulfuric acid is not that big a problem as it is mostly below the altitudes proposed, where it is quite dilute. In fact, the temperatures while hotter than Death Valley are such that one could could probably do something one can do nowhere except Earth: step outside in a birthday suit and survive as long as one could hold one's breath (but run to the cold shower/eyewash station afterwards!). As an added bonus, unlike anywhere except Titan, due to the sheer density of the CO2, such cloud cities would also be far better protected against meteor strikes than any city on Earth.
A 2015 study at Rutgers (preliminary draft here) published the above artwork some time ago to illustrate what a (very hypothetical) more permanent research station might look like and news reports on Monday's announcement almost universally featured the below N.A.S.A. image of a large floating outpost acting as a tender to several H.A.V.O.C. type airships.
Both of these are very ambitious indeed and probably quite far term. For one thing, despite its advantages, Venus would seem to make little sense as a location for space cities, as they'd be far down a gravity well, there's no water except what one can crack from the sulphuric acid and no easy way to bring in supplies from asteroids. In an O'Neal cylinder or on the surface of a planet like Mars a major damage incident is survivable with space suits and repair teams, on Venus if you balloon deflates you're baked, dissolved, and crushed.
So unless the view of the clouds is SPECTACULAR and sufficiently so to somehow justify interplanetary tourism, there's little reason to believe that there would ever be any kind of permanent outpost on Venus.
I mean what could Venus produce that has real value and couldn't be gotten FAR easier somewhere, indeed anywhere else?
"PHOSPHOROUS!"
Oh right...
One of our Crack Team Of 2-D Science Babes reminds us of this paper (PDF) we perused recently that reviewed what scientists know about Venus's atmosphere. Here's an interesting excerpt...
Venera 13, Venera 14, Vega 1, and Vega 2 descent probes all carried X-ray fluorescence instruments. These instruments measured elemental composition of the cloud particles and found not only sulfur, but also phosphorus, chlorine and iron – notably, as much phosphorus as sulphur in the lower clouds below 52 km [Andreichikov et al, Sov. Astron. Lett. 1986, 1987]. A chemical analysis by Krasnopolsky [PSS, 1985] con- cluded that the phosphorus could be in the form of phosphoric acid (H3PO4) aerosols, which would ac- count for the particulates observed by descent probes down to 33 km altitudes
Phosphorus is absolutely vital to life and while theoretically common on earth is concentrated in useable forms mainly in living organisms and in phosphate rocks (mostly fossils of dead organisms). The amount of free phosphorous pretty much dictates the carrying capacity of the planet and it is a real concern for food production as phosphates are a finite resource. Furthermore, additional sources of phosphorus need to be found if humanity is going to expand into space. such deposits are presumed to exist, but on Earth they seem to have been concentrated by biological action leaving a bit of a chicken-egg problem finding it off planet. Even without off planet colonization phosphorous shortages represent a potential disaster for human food supplies. There is discussion of peak phosphorus here, here and here.
Even if the perils of peak phosphorus are overstated, it IS a finite resource and most off planet settlements are going to require off planet sources of phosphorus if they are to expand. Phosphorus could well end up being something akin to the dilithium, quanticum 40,or spice Melange of the real future. The only extraterrestrial places that I've read that it exists in other than trace amounts is the above mentioned cloud layer on Venus and the red clouds of Jupiter (bound in phosphene).
This moves the notion of a floating city on Venus from technically feasible to potentially practical and indeed desirable. See, if the Soviet probes were correct, then there is, in Venus's lower atmosphere, phosphorus (in gaseous form) in greater concentrations than the ubiquitous sulfur. You'd need to pump up atmosphere near the surface, filter out the undesirable stuff and if its phosphoric acid then you have to take out the water and oxygen (I'm sure uses can be found for those) I don't know what reagents might be necessary but this represents a steady supply of phosphorous.
But wait...there's more. Venus has more sunlight than earth, a zillion times as much CO2, and about 4 times as much atmospheric nitrogen as Earth. There's also water to be had from the phosphoric and sulphuric acid. And remember you're better protected from meteor strikes and cosmic rays than on Earth. A Venusian phosphorus-gas mine could grow all its own food.
Art from Technica Molodezhi TM - 9 1971 a Soviet Science Magazine
In the longer term, expanding upon such floating farms, Venus could be the breadbasket of the solar system. All that stuff that can be got so much easier on Luna, Mercury, Mars or The Belt? Well, the cloud cities of Venus ought to be able to just buy them. Of course you have solar power out the wazoo so it's at least conceivable that such an outpost might make something useful out of the carbon in the CO2. Note too that the referenced report also mentions the apparent presence of gaseous iron compounds in the lower atmosphere which might be industrially exploitable as well. Finally, Venus has, as mentioned, well more that three Earths worth of nitrogen in its atmosphere. If Venus sold Mars an atmosphere, there'd still be enough left over for thousands of O'Neal Cylinders. Venus has the potential to be not only self-sufficient but an exporter of food, fertilizer and air.
Of course for any of that that to eventually come to pass we need to confirm the Soviet probe data and do close surveys of the planet. N.A.S.A. seems to be planning just that in the next decade.
This is awesome. Even putting aside the longer term speculations; the fact that N.A.S.A. is looking at innovative missions like this is truly heartening.
With regard to the more ambitious proposals, I think we should begin a movement to have high pressure gaseous phosphoric acid referred to by the trade name "Tibanna".
:While trying to hunt down a picture credit I discovered that there is an extensive disquisition on the topic of Venusian settlement and even terraforming from 2014 here.
UPDATE 2:
:Thanks to Pete Zaitcev in the comments there are some links to much earlier thoughts by John Goff on the matter regarding safe rocket recovery here and here as well as Venusian industrial chemistry here and here.
Crackerjack 2-D Science Babe is Rikka from Haganai
1
Enough floating cities and floating Solar arrays, and you'd end up with a planet-wide solar screen, which might well induce an ice age. Easier to mine ice than air I'd think. Condense the thicker parts of the atmosphere into glaciers Bob's-yer-uncle.
Posted by: jabrwok at Wed Oct 17 11:51:03 2018 (BlRin)
Posted by: Wonderduck at Wed Oct 17 14:49:25 2018 (OjmJE)
3
I just want to build some giant sunshades and screen Venus from sunlight for a few years. I figure it'll rain for many decades but once it has, the atmosphere will be a lot thinner.
Still not breathable, but thinner.
I just wonder how long it would take the surface to cool under the deluge.
Posted by: Ed Hering at Wed Oct 17 18:22:06 2018 (NcP+4)
Posted by: Mauser at Wed Oct 17 23:17:15 2018 (Ix1l6)
5
Jon Goff spent some attention on the problem of the material supply when you're surrounded by gas.
Honestly at this point I'm thinking maybe Mercury would be more amenable to colonies.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at Fri Oct 19 13:34:22 2018 (LZ7Bg)
6
Mercury, at the poles is surprisingly amenable, there seems to be a lot of ice in the shadows there.
Outside the ices though, there are NO volitiles and it has Mars gravity. OTOH, even away from the poles it's ok to go exploring during the very long night.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Fri Oct 19 14:19:13 2018 (Oqyrj)
One of the Brickmuppet's Crack Team of Science Babes brings us the delightful news that Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has declassified about 300 more above ground nuclear test films.
Both the above and below are of the same test of the SADM, nuclear backpack bomb (positioned 110 feet underground).
Issac Arthur's video this week is on the colonization of Ceres. This one is pretty neat. I had not realized that the gravity on Ceres was so low that spin habitats could be put on the surface and there would only be the equivalent to about a three degree list to port for the inhabitants.
The fact that sunlight is actually bright enough to grow plants and be marginal for solar power as far out as Jupiter is interesting as well.
I'm much more of the Dandridge Cole / Gerald O'Neal school of thought on space colonies. I'm skeptical of Mars settlement, especially when A Stanford Torus or O'Neal cylinder pretty much will have correct gravity. They can be anywhere, perhaps next to (or inside) mineral rich asteroids and potentially move if needed.
1. With Niven & Pournelle, I always wondered why, after spending millions to get out of a gravity well, you would want to go down another.
2. Barring a cultural change far off my radar (which really isn't far) there are not going to be off-world colonies except as playgrounds of the hyper-rich. The entire notion is predicated on Malthusian/Ehrlich (so: false and insane) grounds of population growth. The populations of those that have the IQ & culture to live in space is in decline. The population that's still growing? I wouldn't trust them to close the airlock doors.
Posted by: Clayton Barnett at Sat Jul 7 15:56:55 2018 (ug1Mc)
He has a fairly epic speech impediment. Most of his videos mention this at the beginning and suggest one avails oneself of captioning. Note that in the last year he has improved dramatically, as the show is, it seems, good therapy for him.
He also used to have an Elmer Fudd pic at the beginning of each episode but I suspect there was a DMCA issue.
Note too that Mr. Arthur also did a couple of tours in Iraq.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Sat Jul 7 16:06:56 2018 (3bBAK)
4
I'd like to see a serious discussion of a habitat design modeled on the roller bearing. One ring nested inside another, with the two kept apart by magnets and vacuum. The inner ring would spin to produce centripetal acceleration, while the outer ring would not spin and would be sufficiently robust to contain the inner ring.
I don't have the math or engineering know-how to calculate the stresses or dimensions needed, but I suspect that such a design could be made arbitrarily large without needing exotic materials. Just make the outer ring more robust. As it's not experiencing any centrifugal tension itself (by virtue of not spinning) it can be optimized to whatever thickness is necessary to constrain the inner ring.
Start mass producing such nested-ring habitats (diameter 300 miles, length, 100 miles), and every group on Earth which wanted its own world, away from *those* people, could buy one and build its own little Utopia.
We'd need a Launch Loop to make access to orbit cheap enough to make the Lunar mining colony economical before we could start building the Rings, but none of that would require technological breakthroughs, or any scientific advances.
Well, unless the nested-ring geometry doesn't work as I expect it to.
Posted by: jabrwok at Sun Jul 8 06:04:11 2018 (wKZS0)
5
The spin gravity puts a strain on the habitats such that the maximum size with steel is a cylinder five miles by 20...Now that does have a safety factor built in.
You're right about the bearings though. That is going to be an issue in these combined gravity habitats.
Regarding the rock; Even the old Stanford Torus used slag brought up from the moon to provide a nonrotating radiation shield. The O'Neal Cylinder designs did as well, but most illustrations omitted the rad shield for clarity in exactly the same way this one doesn't.
Building them in Asteroids as I.Arthur suggests kills a couple of birds with one stone...er asteroid. The materials are in-situ, and the shielding is already there.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at Sun Jul 8 07:49:21 2018 (Es+wK)
6
As I understand it, the strain induced by the spin is basically tension produced by centrifugal force. The geometry I'm visualizing has a spinning ring *inside* another, thicker, non-spinning ring, like the <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?q=roller+bearing&t=h_&iax=images&ia=images">roller bearings</a> in a skateboard or a fidget spinner. The outer ring would act like a railroad for the "train" of the inner ring, and could be made arbitrarily thick so that it could handle the angular momentum produced by the spinning inner ring.
If it would work, then the whole system could be scaled up to arbitrarily large diameters, with no need for scrith or other unobtania.
Unfortunately I'm not an engineer, so I can't prove that it would work.
Posted by: jabrwok at Sun Jul 8 11:26:38 2018 (wKZS0)
7
A containing outer shell doesn't cancel the outward force, it just applies an additional force in the opposite direction. So now your inner shell material is being subjected to not just the tension from the centripetal force, but is also facing friction heating, compression, and drag from the outer shell. Your design would create more problems than it solves, and would result in a smaller habitat, not a larger one. (Also not an engineer, but that's pretty basic physics...)
Posted by: David at Sun Jul 8 13:37:35 2018 (JMkaQ)
8
<i>A containing outer shell doesn't cancel the outward force, it just applies an additional force in the opposite direction.</i>
Yes, thereby preventing the inner ring from tearing itself apart.
<i>but is also facing friction heating, compression, and drag from the outer shell.</i>
There would be no friction or drag if the rings were held apart with magnetic fields and had only vacuum between them. The "compression" is a non-issue as keeping the inner ring compressed is the entire point of the configuration.
Posted by: jabrwok at Sun Jul 8 18:53:43 2018 (wKZS0)
9
There would be no physical friction. The magnetic fields on the other hand...
Did you know that the moon's gravity is slowing the earth's rotation? It's a quarter million miles away, roughly. The outer ring and magnets would be a lot closer. So you'd need a fair bit of energy to be input constantly to counter that.
Another, more critical point. The outer ring is there to keep the inner ring from flying apart. Which means that, through the magnetic forces, the inner ring is transferring its centrifugal force outwards to the outer ring.
What keeps the outer ring from breaking up?
Thickness. The outer ring could be as robust as necessary to contain the centrifugal force being generated by the inner ring. Given that the outer ring would not be spinning, it's own mass would put no strain on its tensile strength.
As for the possible resistance produced by the interaction of the magnetic bearings, well, that's a possible obstacle. But again, I'm not an engineer, so I can't calculate whether that would be a problem or not, nor how difficult it would be to overcome. Possibly some electromagnets mixed in with the permanent magnets would be enough to overcome the hypothetical resistance.
To be honest, I was hoping there would be an engineer reading this thread, or that someone hereabouts would know one, who could run the numbers and provide a definitive answer.
Posted by: jabrwok at Mon Jul 9 14:35:48 2018 (BlRin)
11
I'm no engineer, but the other 'non-trivial' problem to borrow a word from SDB, is that you'd have to make certain the counter-forces need to spin it back up (or in the first place) would have to be very exactly balanced, and monitored in real time. I'm not sure how you could do that in a way that wouldn't set up a negative reinforcement cycle that got further and further out of control. Let's not even touch on where you're going to get non-electromagnets big and powerful enough to balance your giga-ton monstrosity. The moon's got a surprisingly high amount of iron, but that's not all it takes. And adjusting the position of a two-part "torus station" would be...tricky.
This reminds me of the flywheel discussion on Chizumatic. Which I'd link, but it's dead now, and I don't know the mirrors.
12
Ubu, Chizumatic is still up; denbeste.nu is down. Was this the link you were looking for?
Some of USS Clueless is still mirrored at sdb.dotclue.org.
Posted by: Rick C at Mon Jul 9 19:22:21 2018 (ITnFO)
13
Someday, we should reconnect with Steven's brother and see about transferring the domain registration, or at least renewing it and pointing it at the current server. I decided not to pursue it at the time.
14you'd have to make certain the counter-forces need to spin it back up (or in the first place) would have to be very exactly balanced, and monitored in real time.
My thoughts on spinning up the inner ring were along the lines of having mass-drivers on the outside of the Rim Walls. Push reaction masses along those mass-drivers in one direction and the inner ring spins in the other. You could use a LOT of reaction masses, or just some very dense one, or both. This would give you the advantage of allowing for the launch of interstellar space probes (the reaction masses) while bringing the inner ring up to the desired rate of spin. Or you could just use charged particles and take a long time to get the desires spin rate.
I agree that the magnetic bearings are a possible stumbling block. I keep hoping I'll run into an engineer who can address that concern. But I don't think it's an impossible obstacle.
Posted by: jabrwok at Tue Jul 10 08:54:51 2018 (BlRin)
15
Yep, that's the one, at 20060102. I really miss his stuff.
I can practically hear SDB complaining about derailing the thread....
Posted by: Ubu at Tue Jul 10 11:51:48 2018 (SlLGE)
Hobby Space News of the commercial space industry A Babe In The Universe Rather Eclectic Cosmology Encyclopedia Astronautica Superb spacecraft resource The Unwanted Blog Scott Lowther blogs about forgotten aerospace projects and sells amazingly informative articles on the same. Also, there are cats. Transterrestrial Musings Commentary on Infinity...and beyond! Colony WorldsSpace colonization news! The Alternate Energy Blog It's a blog about alternate energy (DUH!) Next Big Future Brian Wang: Tracking our progress to the FUTURE. Nuclear Green Charles Barton, who seems to be either a cool curmudgeon, or a rational hippy, talks about energy policy and the terrible environmental consequences of not going nuclear Energy From Thorium Focuses on the merits of thorium cycle nuclear reactors WizBang Current events commentary...with a wiz and a bang The Gates of Vienna Tenaciously studying a very old war The Anchoress insightful blogging, presumably from the catacombs Murdoc Online"Howling Mad Murdoc" has a millblog...golly! EaglespeakMaritime security matters Commander Salamander Fullbore blackshoe blogging! Belmont Club Richard Fernandez blogs on current events BaldilocksUnderstated and interesting blog on current events The Dissident Frogman French bi-lingual current events blog The "Moderate" VoiceI don't think that word means what they think it does....but this lefty blog is a worthy read nonetheless. Meryl Yourish News, Jews and Meryls' Views Classical Values Eric Scheie blogs about the culture war and its incompatibility with our republic. Jerry Pournell: Chaos ManorOne of Science fictions greats blogs on futurism, current events, technology and wisdom A Distant Soil The website of Colleen Dorans' superb fantasy comic, includes a blog focused on the comic industry, creator issues and human rights. John C. Wright The Sci-Fi/ Fantasy writer muses on a wide range of topics. Now Read This! The founder of the UK Comics Creators Guild blogs on comics past and present. The Rambling Rebuilder Charity, relief work, roleplaying games Rats NestThe Art and rantings of Vince Riley Gorilla Daze Allan Harvey, UK based cartoonist and comics historian has a comicophillic blog! Pulpjunkie Tim Driscoll reviews old movies, silents and talkies, classics and clunkers. Suburban Banshee Just like a suburban Leprechaun....but taller, more dangerous and a certified genius. Satharn's Musings Through TimeThe Crazy Catlady of The Barony of Tir Ysgithr アニ・ノート(Ani-Nouto) Thoughtful, curmudgeonly, otakuism that pulls no punches and suffers no fools. Chizumatic Stephen Den Beste analyzes anime...with a microscope, a slide rule and a tricorder. Wonderduck Anime, Formula One Racing, Sad Girls in Snow...Duck Triumphalism Beta Waffle What will likely be the most thoroughly tested waffle evah! Zoopraxiscope Too In this thrilling sequel to Zoopraxiscope, Don, Middle American Man of Mystery, keeps tabs on anime, orchids, and absurdities. Mahou Meido MeganekkoUbu blogs on Anime, computer games and other non-vital interests Twentysided More geekery than you can shake a stick at Shoplifting in the Marketplace of Ideas Sounds like Plaigarism...but isn't Ambient IronyAll Meenuvians Praise the lathe of the maker! Hail Pixy!!